
Broader Implications of the Conflict in Goma
Current Situation
The conflict in Goma continues to pose a complex set of challenges for the DRC. Resistance groups remain mobilized against the M23 rebels, who have seized control of key strategic points, including the airport and the border with Rwanda. Rwanda’s decision to close the border and deploy substantial military and police forces has escalated tensions. Meanwhile, gunfire in the western part of the city has decreased, signalling a potential lull in hostilities in that area.
Government Communication and Strategy
The DRC government struggles with managing the conflict and effectively disseminating information. Minister of State Muhindo Nzangi, who introduced the “Wazalendo” initiative to encourage local resistance, has questioned the extent of M23’s control in Goma. Nzangi’s claims that certain images of the rebels were manipulated highlight broader issues in intelligence gathering and analysis. These deficiencies hinder the government’s ability to address both domestic and international concerns effectively.
Dynamics of Armed Groups
The FARDC, Wazalendo groups, and the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) face significant challenges in maintaining a united defence in Goma. Frustration with MONUSCO has grown, especially after the peacekeeping mission agreed to disarm these groups under pressure from M23. This decision has strained relations between the DRC’s armed factions and international forces, complicating stabilization efforts.
Meanwhile, reliable sources indicate that Rwanda is accommodating FARDC and Wazalendo soldiers who have surrendered, with injured personnel receiving medical treatment. This development adds a layer of complexity to the regional dynamics.
Domestic and International Repercussions
The DRC’s handling of the crisis has drawn criticism, with potential long-term consequences for its international reputation. Attacks on MONUSCO and incendiary statements from officials like Justice Minister Constant Mutamba have created an image of instability and hostility toward foreign partners. This perception could diminish international support and sympathy for the DRC, reducing the likelihood of assistance from allies.
Additionally, violent protests and threats to diplomatic missions have raised concerns about the safety of foreign entities in the region. This heightened risk could deter international investors and financial institutions, further isolating the DRC economically. Without foreign investment and financial aid, the DRC’s ability to fund critical development projects will be severely constrained, exacerbating economic challenges.
Discover More
Strategic Interdiction of Fuel Supply Lines and Hostage Leverage by JNIM
On the morning of 29 January 2026, Mali experienced one of the most consequential jihadist operations of recent months, not due to its symbolic value, but because of its systemic strategic impact. A large fuel convoy originating from Senegal and transiting through western Mali along the Diboli–Kayes corridor was ambushed and neutralized by an estimated 100 fighters affiliated with Katiba Macina, a core component of the Group for the Support of Islam and Muslims (JNIM).
Niamey Airport Attack: Islamic State Claims Responsibility
Less than 48 hours after the assault on Diori Hamani International Airport in Niamey on 29 January 2026, the IS-Sahel formally claimed responsibility. ASA assesses this confirms the attack was not an isolated security breach, but a deliberate, high-value operation aimed at Niger’s military and strategic infrastructure.
REQUEST FOR INTEREST
How can we help you de-risk Africa?
Please enter your contact information and your requirements and needs for us to come back to you with a relevant proposal.


